Fighting for peace within: The existential-relational positions into which we train soldiers and the challenge of their reaggregation into society
Document Type
Journal Article
Role
Author
Published In
The Humanistic Psychologist
Volume
54
Issue
1
First Page
77
Last Page
96
Publication Date
3-2026
Abstract
We train our soldier warriors into a mix of two existential-relational, developmental positions: the contiguous and paranoid-schizoid. Functioning within these positions is adaptive for the task of fighting but not living within peacetime society, where our embrace of the complexities of our moral being-ness is essential for wholesome functioning. Because we do not “untrain” our soldiers with the same commitment of intensity and resources that we apply to training them, our warriors are too often left in a moral in-betweenness which can result in serious psychological issues and greater inclination to do self-harm. While there are programs to address our soldiers’ postfighting problems, they are either reactive rather or far too limited in their scope of assistance. In short, they are inadequate and a shirking of the moral responsibility we have as regular society members to see that untraining or retraining is institutionally prioritized.
Keywords
Psychological effects of combat, Reintegration challenges for veterans, Military personnel
Suggested Citation
Webb, R. E., & Rosenbaum, P. J. (2026). Fighting for peace within: The existential-relational positions into which we train soldiers and the challenge of their reaggregation into society. The Humanistic Psychologist, 54(1), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/hum0000378

Comments
Author's manuscript freely available on their website.